Journal of Hepatology, vol. 37/1,pp 78-86, July 2002
Improved prognosis of postoperative hepatocellular
carcinoma patients when treated with functional foods: a prospective
cohort study
Yoichi Matsui * matsui@takii.kmu.ac.jp
, Junya Uhara, Sohei Satoi, Masaki Kaibori, Hitoshi Yamada,
Hiroaki Kitade, Atsusi Imamura, Soichiro Takai, Yusai Kawaguchi,
A.-Hon Kwon and Yasuo Kamiyama
First Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University,
10-15 Fumizono, Moriguchi, Osaka 570-8507, Japan
Abstract
Background/Aims: Active hexose correlated compound
(AHCC) is a newly developed functional food. In vitro experiments
have shown that AHCC enhances natural killer cell activity,
and may be considered a potent biological response modifier
in the treatment of cancer patients. However, the effects of
AHCC in a clinical setting have not been reported. We seek to
determine whether AHCC can improve the prognosis of hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC) patients following surgical treatment.
Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed
from February 1, 1992 to December 31, 2001. A total of 269 consecutive
patients with histologically confirmed HCC were studied. All
of the patients underwent resection of a liver tumor. Time to
treatment failure (disease recurrence or death) and ten parameters
related to liver function after surgery were examined.
Results: Of the 269 patients, 113 received AHCC
orally after undergoing curative surgery (AHCC group). The AHCC
group had a significantly longer no recurrence period (hazard
ratio (HR), 0.639; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.429-0.952;
P=0.0277) and an increased overall survival rate (HR,
0.421; 95% CI, 0.253-0.701; P=0.0009) when compared to
the control group by Cox's multivariate analysis.
Conclusions: This study suggests that AHCC intake
can improve the prognosis of postoperative HCC patients.
Keywords: Active hexose correlated compound; Biological
response modifier; Cirrhosis; Functional food; Hepatitis; Hepatocellular
carcinoma
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +81-6-6992-1001, ext.
3262; fax: +81-6-6992-7343
1. Introduction
The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is distributed
widely over different geographical areas. There is a high prevalence
of HCC in Asia that is similar to that of stomach cancer in
Japan. Moreover, the number of HCC patients is showing a gradual,
but definite increase. The prevention and treatment of the recurrence
of HCC following hepatic resection has been studied extensively.
These treatments include repeated hepatic resection, interventional
radiology (chemoembolization), percutaneous ethanol injections,
percutaneous microwave coagulation, and the administration of
hormonal agents. However, the prognosis for HCC remains unsatisfactory,
with the 5-year survival rate after primary surgical treatment
at approximately 40% in Japan. In addition to the treatments
mentioned above, there have been many attempts to treat the
cancer by stimulating the patient's immune system. Although
several biological response modifiers (BRMs) have been developed
such as BCG, Picibanil, PSK, lentinan, interferon, and interleukin-12,
the clinical efficacy of these substances has not been clearly
confirmed. Recently, the efficacy of immunotherapy in suppressing
the postsurgical recurrence of HCC was reported as a clinical
trial.
Active hexose correlated compound (AHCC) is a functional food
developed by the Amino Up Chemical Co. Ltd (Sapporo, Japan)
in 1989. A food is considered functional if it is satisfactorily
demonstrated to affect beneficially one or more target functions
in the body, in a way that is beyond adequate nutritional effects
and is relevant to either the state of well-being and health
or the reduction of the risk of a disease. The AHCC is an extract
of Basidiomycotina, which is obtained through the hybridization
of several types of mushrooms. Ghoneum et al. reported that
AHCC enhances the natural killer (NK) cell activity of cancer
patients, and may be considered a potent BRM in the treatment
of cancer patients. It has been suggested that NK cell activity
may be associated with cancer incidence. Furthermore, AHCC has
been reported to reduce the metastasis rate of rat mammary adenocarcinomas,
to increase detoxification enzymes in the liver, to protect
the liver from CCl4-induced liver injury , and to
prevent diabetes induced by streptozotocin in animal models.
However, there have been no reports on the effects of AHCC in
a clinical setting.
This study was initiated to evaluate the effects of AHCC, as
an orally administered BRM, on the prognosis of patients with
HCC following surgical treatment.
2. Patients and methods
To determine whether AHCC can improve the prognosis of HCC
patients following surgical treatment, a prospective cohort
study was performed. All consecutive patients with HCC who underwent
surgical treatment from February 1, 1992 to October 31, 2001
at the First Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University,
Osaka, Japan were included in this study, if they met the following
criteria: (1) the patient had undergone a curative resection
of their liver tumor at our Department and (2) the presence
of histologically proven HCC in their resected liver specimen
was demonstrated. The therapeutic options were offered to all
of the patients during their hospitalization. The enrolled patients
were addressed to each arm of the study based on their choice
of the therapeutic options, and were trusted with the self-administration
of AHCC. If the patient selected the AHCC ingestion, they began
ingesting AHCC at 3.0g/day from the date of their discharge.
The primary endpoint was survival and the secondary endpoint
was a no recurrence period. In addition, ten biochemical parameters
were examined yearly to evaluate the liver function until death
or the end of the observation period (December 31, 2001). These
parameters include the serum levels of aspartate transaminase
activity (AST), alanine transaminase activity, alkaline phosphatase
activity, g-glutamyltransferase activity (GGT), total bilirubin,
albumin, cholinesterase activity, platelet count, a-fetoprotein,
and protein induced by vitamin K absence (PIVKA II).
Randomization was not performed in this study, and a placebo
was not used for the controls. The study protocol conformed
to the ethical guidelines of our institute and was approved
by the institutional review committee. AHCC was generously provided
by the Amino Up Chemical Co. Ltd, and was developed by extraction
from a cultured broth of Basidiomycotina.
2.1. Patients
By October 31, 2001, a total of 269 patients underwent surgical
treatment for HCC. Of these 269 patients, a total of 47 cases
were excluded as follows: 28 cases of non-curative resection,
four cases of operative death, seven cases of hospital death,
one case with a mental disorder, one case with primary biliary
cirrhosis, one case with a histologically proven combined type
of HCC and cholangiocellular carcinoma, and five cases that
withdrew from follow-up just after discharge. As a result, the
remaining 222 patients were enrolled in this study and were
observed either until death or until the last follow-up date
(December 31, 2001) for the living patients. Of these 222 patients,
113 were given AHCC (3.0g/day) orally after undergoing surgery,
in accordance with the preferences of the patient (AHCC group).
The administration of AHCC continued until death or to the last
follow-up date for the living patients. The remaining 109 patients
were monitored after the hepatectomy, but were not given AHCC
(control group). The no recurrence rate and the overall survival
of the patients in the AHCC group were compared to that of the
control group.
The aim of this study was explained to all of the approved
patients in advance, and informed consent was obtained. All
of the patients were trusted with their choice of AHCC ingestion,
following the informed consent. Therefore, the patients were
enrolled in either the AHCC group or the control group entirely
according to their preferences. Although not a controlled study,
we obtained a similar number of patients in each group with
the same clinical and pathological characteristics according
to the preferences of the patients. In the early years of the
study, a few more patients preferred the control group than
the AHCC group. However, the number of patients who preferred
the functional food gradually increased. Eventually, approximately
half of the patients preferred the functional food at the end
of the study period of 9 years and 11 months. This change in
preference resulted in the difference of the median follow-up
period between the two groups shown in Section 3.
2.2. Follow-up
Perioperative clinical parameters such as the patient characteristics,
preoperative liver function data, operative factors, and tumor
characteristics were compared between the AHCC and control groups.
Cirrhotic status was histopathologically determined in non-cancerous
liver tissues according to the New Inuyama Classification. The
staging system used followed the General Rules for the Clinical
and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer by the Liver
Cancer Study Group of Japan, which is commonly used in Japan.
The overall survival, defined as the interval between the date
of surgery and the date of death or the last follow-up information
for the living patients, was also evaluated. The most common
cause of death was cancer, but liver failure and variceal bleeding
were included among the causes of death. The no recurrence rate
was also evaluated, and was defined as the interval between
the date of surgery to the date that a diagnosis of recurrence
was confirmed by a positive sonogram, computed tomography, magnetic
resonance imaging, or hepatic angiography. The no recurrence
rate was calculated after censoring the patients who had not
shown a recurrence at the time of death.
All patients were given follow-up examinations with routine
liver biochemical tests. Every 3 months, biochemical tests were
performed at the central hospital laboratory. A liver ultrasound
was also performed every 3 months. In addition, computed tomography
and/or magnetic resonance imaging were performed every 6 months.
Finally, an angiographic examination was performed after admission
when a recurrence was suspected. Once an intrahepatic recurrence
had been confirmed, patients in both groups generally received
transarterial chemo-embolization (TACE), whereas some patients
with recurrence underwent alternative treatments (Table 1).
Patients without recurrence were not treated with any other
drugs for cancer during follow-up.
2.3. Statistical analysis
In order to evaluate the homogeneity of the treatment vs. control
groups with respect to perioperative clinical factors, data
was analyzed using the chi-square test or Mann-Whitney U-test
to compare differences between two series. A two-way analysis
of variance with Scheff's F-test was used to compare
the postoperative course of the laboratory data between the
two groups.
The no recurrence curves and the overall survival curves were
plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were
also performed. The time-fixed Cox's proportional hazard model
was used to estimate the effects of AHCC on the no recurrence
rate and the overall survival. For univariate screening purposes,
of the 40 potential risk factors shown in Table 1, the treatment
for recurrence and the cause of death were excluded and the
remaining 38 factors were examined univariately by the Cox's
model, because these two variables were time-dependent factors.
These 38 variables were all categorized as binary. Cirrhotic
status was dichotomized into two categorical data group: with
histopathologically confirmed cirrhosis or without histopathologically
confirmed cirrhosis. The staging system was divided into two
categorical groups: I/II and III/IVA. The resected liver volume
was divided into two categorical groups: sub-segmentectomy or
less and more than sub-segmentectomy. Since the median of the
amount of alcohol intake was 0g/day of ethanol, the amount of
alcohol intake was dichotomized into two groups: patients with
a drinking habit and those without. The number of nodules was
separated into two categorical data: single or not. The levels
of tumor markers (a-fetoprotein and PIVKA II) that were highly
skewed were divided into two categorical groups at 100µg/l and
100AU/l, respectively, which were clinically relevant. Other
continuous variables were dichotomized into two groups at their
overall median. All factors found to be significantly associated
univariately with survival were included in the multivariate
Cox's analysis with a stepwise method. The assumption of the
proportional hazards was checked using the log-log plotting
method and the parallel lines between the two groups were confirmed.
A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically
significant.
Table 1. Clinical background of patients treated with AHCC
and controls a
|
AHCC group |
Control group |
p |
Patient characteristics
|
|
|
|
Age (years) |
65 (59-70) |
63 (57-68) |
0.134 |
Gender (male/female) |
81/25 |
87/15 |
0.148 |
Cirrhosis (yes/no) |
49/57 |
38/64 |
0.242 |
Child classification (A/B) |
73/33 |
77/25 |
0.363 |
Alcohol intake (yes/no) |
46/60 |
47/55 |
0.803 |
Esophageal varices (yes/no) |
28/52 |
22/53 |
0.119 |
Hepatitis viral infection |
|
|
|
Type
B/type C/none |
32/85/12 |
26/84/10 |
0.785 |
Preoperative TACE (yes/no) |
46/59 |
45/55 |
0.975 |
Previous or concurrent |
|
|
|
Malignancy (yes/no) |
9/97 |
10/92 |
0.93 |
Treatment for recurrence (yes/no) |
35/4 |
57/13 |
0.382 |
TACE |
35 |
50 |
|
PEIT |
1 |
3 |
|
PMCT |
0 |
6 |
|
Re-resection |
1 |
6 |
|
Systemic chemotherapy |
1 |
1 |
|
Irradiation |
3 |
1 |
|
Cause of death |
|
|
|
Recurrence/non-recurrence |
21/2 |
47/4 |
0.999 |
Preoperative liver function
data |
|
|
|
Albumin (g/l) |
37 (34-40) |
39 (36-41) |
0.012b |
Total bilirubin (mg/dl) |
0.8 (0.6-1.1) |
0.8 (0.6-1.1) |
0.578 |
Cholinesterase (U/l) |
3721 (3034-4371) |
3787 (2824-4851) |
0.808 |
Aspartate transaminase (U/l) |
45 (31-63) |
44 (32-61) |
0.835 |
Alanine transaminase (U/l) |
47 (28-72) |
43 (26-62) |
0.386 |
Alkaline phosphatase (U/l) |
243 (183-314 |
218 (165-300) |
0.966 |
g-glutamyltransferase (U/l) |
61 (33-95) |
53 (34-87) |
0.875 |
Platelet count (×109/l) |
115 (91-166) |
138 (100-190) |
0.012b |
Prothrombin time (%) |
90 (82-96) |
90 (82-100) |
0.505 |
Hepaplastin test (%) |
83 (73-96) |
87 (74-98) |
0.349 |
Antithrombin III (%) |
79 (70-87) |
81 (69-92) |
0.625 |
ICG R 15min (%) |
16.8 (12.2-23.3) |
15.8 (10.6-21.0) |
0.1 |
ICG K value |
0.122 (0.096-0.147) |
0.121 (0.103-0.150) |
0.398 |
Redox tolerance index |
0.478 (0.250-0.880) |
0.425 (0.185-0.836) |
0.576 |
99mTc-GSA liver
scintigraphy Rmax |
0.393 (0.330-0.507) |
0.422 (0.284-0.500) |
0.717 |
Operative data |
|
|
|
Resected liver volume |
|
|
0.719 |
Sub-segmentectomy or less |
65 |
57 |
|
"More than sub-segmentectomy,
less than lobectomy" |
28 |
30 |
|
Lobectomy or more |
13 |
15 |
|
Total blood loss (ml) |
1006 (475-1593) |
920 (420-1710) |
0.635 |
Blood transfusion (yes/no) |
51/55 |
52/50 |
0.784 |
Operation length (min) |
270 (205-340) |
263 (200-345) |
0.6 |
Postoperative complications
(yes/no) |
28/78 |
23/79 |
0.627 |
Postoperative hospital stay
(days) |
22 (17-34) |
24 (18-32) |
0.431 |
Tumor characteristics |
3.0 (2.0-4.5) |
3.1 (2.2-5.0) |
0.411 |
Number of nodules (single/two
or more) |
81/25 |
76/26 |
0.874 |
Differentiation (well/moderate/poor) |
12/72/19 |
9/66/22 |
0.694 |
Capsule (yes/no) |
89/17 |
83/16 |
0.981 |
Portal vein thrombosis (yes/no) |
5/101 |
3/99 |
0.76 |
Stage (I/II/III/IVA)c |
24/49/26/7 |
20/50/21/11 |
0.633 |
Basal a-fetoprotein |
|
|
|
(Less than 100µg/l/more) |
65/41 |
61/40 |
0.999 |
Basal PIVKA II(Less than 100AU/l/more) |
44/54 |
43/55 |
0.999 |
a. AHCC, active hexose correlated compound;
TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; PEIT, percutaneous ethanol
injection therapy; PMCT, percutaneous microwave coagulation
therapy; ICG, indocyanine green; GSA, galactosyl human serum
albumin; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K absence.
b. Significant.
c. The Stage was defined according to the General Rules for
the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer
by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. The data are expressed
as a median (interquartile interval).
3. Results
The use of AHCC showed no side effects. Only three patients
in the AHCC group refused to continue the use of AHCC during
the study due to slight nausea. These three cases were censored
at that time. Some cases had minor complaints of difficulty
in swallowing the AHCC due to the granular type of its material.
However, these patients did not stop the treatment. Four patients
in the control group began to take AHCC during the observation
period because they chose to take AHCC. These four cases were
censored at that time.
Table 1 demonstrates the similar clinical backgrounds of the
patients between the two treatment groups. The albumin levels
and the platelet count were significantly different between
the two groups preoperatively. However, the differences were
disadvantageous to the AHCC group. Most patients were diagnosed
with an underlying viral hepatitis or cirrhosis, but they also
had well-compensated liver function. No patients had ascites
preoperatively.
3.1. No recurrence rate and overall survival
By December 31, 2001, 39 (34.5%) patients had recurrences of
HCC in the AHCC group, while 72 (66.1%) had recurrences in the
control group. The results suggest that the use of AHCC had
a significant effect (P=0.0335, log-rank test) on the
no recurrence rate (Fig. 1A). Only 23 (20.4%) patients had died
in the AHCC group by the end of the follow-up period, whereas
51 (46.8%) had died in the control group at the end of the follow-up
period. The causes of death were 91.3% recurrence in the AHCC
group and 92.2% in the control group. Patient survival was significantly
higher (P=0.0032, log-rank test) in the AHCC group (Fig.
1B). The follow-up period ranged from 2 to 108 months in the
AHCC group, and from 2 to 117 months in the control group. The
median follow-up period was 28 months in the AHCC group and
30 months in the control group.
Time-fixed Cox's univariate analysis was performed using all
of the 38 variables mentioned above (Table 1). Of these 38 variables,
the following 11 variables were significantly related univariately
to the no recurrence rate: AHCC intake, cirrhosis, basal total
bilirubin, basal cholinesterase activity, basal antithrombin
III activity, ICG R 15min (%), blood transfusion, number
of nodules, Stage, basal a-fetoprotein levels, and basal PIVKA
II levels (Table 2). These variables were included in the Cox's
multivariate analysis. In the last step, the following five
variables entered the model and could not be removed: AHCC intake,
basal total bilirubin, basal cholinesterase activity, number
of nodules, and basal a-fetoprotein levels (Table 4). Accordingly,
these five variables were significantly associated with the
no recurrence rate, and were found to be independent factors.
In the multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio of no recurrence
in the AHCC group was reduced to 0.639 from 0.658 by the univariate
analysis (Table 4).
|
|
Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the no recurrence
rate and overall survival of HCC patients after hepatic resection.
The thick line indicates survival in the AHCC group, and the
thin line represents the control group. (A) No recurrence rate.
There was a significant difference between the two groups on
the log-rank test (P=0.0335). (B) Overall survival. There
was also a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.0032).
Of the 38 variables, the following 13 were significantly related
univariately to the overall survival: AHCC intake, cirrhosis,
Child classification, basal albumin level, basal cholinesterase
activity, ICG 15min (%), ICG K value, operation length,
number of nodules, blood transfusion, Stage, basal a-fetoprotein
levels, and basal PIVKA II levels (Table 3). These 13 variables
were included in the Cox's multivariate analysis. In the last
step, the following five variables entered the model and could
not be removed: AHCC intake, ICG 15min (%), number of nodules,
Stage, and basal a-fetoprotein levels (Table 4). Accordingly,
these five variables were significantly associated with the
overall survival, and were found to be independent factors.
In the multivariate analysis, the hazard ratio of overall survival
in the AHCC group was reduced to 0.421 from 0.485 by the univariate
analysis (Table 4).
3.2. Biochemical parameters
Table 2. Significant variables in the univariate analysis
for the no recurrence ratea
Significant variables |
ß |
SE |
HR(95% CI) |
p |
|
|
|
|
|
AHCC intake |
-0.418 |
0.200 |
0.658 |
0.0369 |
(Yes vs. no) |
|
|
(0.444-0.975) |
|
Cirrhosis |
-0.485 |
0.194 |
0.616 |
0.0126 |
(No vs. yes) |
|
|
(0.421-0.901) |
|
Basal total bilirubin |
-0.461 |
0.192 |
0.631 |
0.0164 |
(<0.8 vs. >0.8mg/dl) |
|
|
(0.433-0.919) |
|
Basal cholinesterase |
-0.502 |
0.1960 |
0.605 |
0.0102 |
(>3768 vs. <3768U/l) |
|
|
(0.412-0.888) |
|
Basal antithrombin III |
-0.523 |
0.222 |
0.593 |
0.0187 |
(>80 vs. <80%) |
|
|
(0.383-0.917) |
|
ICG R 15min |
-0.396 |
0.193 |
0.673 |
0.0398 |
(<16 vs. 16%) |
|
|
(0.461-0.982) |
|
Blood transfusion |
-0.432 |
0.193 |
0.649 |
0.0255 |
(No vs. yes) |
|
|
(0.445-0.948) |
|
Number of nodules |
-0.980 |
0.199 |
0.375 |
<0.0001 |
(Single vs. two or more) |
|
|
(0.254-0.554) |
|
Stage |
-0.550 |
0.195 |
0.577 |
0.0048 |
(I/II vs. III/IVA)b |
|
|
(0.394-0.846) |
|
Basal a-fetoprotein |
-0.767 |
0.209 |
0.464 |
0.0002 |
(<100 vs. >100µg/l) |
|
|
(0.308-0.699) |
|
Basal PIVKA II |
-0.626 |
0.203 |
0.535 |
0.0021 |
(<100 vs. >100AU/l) |
|
|
(0.359-0.797) |
|
a. AHCC, active hexose correlated compound;
ICG, indocyanine green; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K
absence;ß, regression coefficients; SE,
standard error; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
b. The Stage was defined according to the General Rules for
the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer
by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.
4. Discussion
HCC is a major health concern worldwide, with an incidence
of approximately one million cases per year. Recently, the early
detection of HCC has become possible because of progress in
diagnostic imaging, and the incidence of resection for HCC has
increased greatly during the last decade. As a result, the short-term
outcome has improved greatly, and no-mortality series on liver
resection for HCC were reported. Furthermore, there have been
significant improvements in patients prognosis for those cases
with HCC who were treated recently with liver resection in comparison
to those treated with resection in the early 1990s . However,
the long-term results are not yet satisfactory. Although hepatic
resection is the most effective form of treatment for patients
with HCC, the incidence of postoperative recurrence, which is
the main cause of the poor long-term results, remains extremely
high. Moreover, the cumulative intrahepatic recurrence rate
has been reported at 100% at 5 years after the resection of
a single HCC in cirrhotic patients with viral hepatitis.
To prevent recurrence and/or to prolong survival, the most
widely used option is adjuvant chemotherapy through a catheter
inserted into the hepatic artery. However, the efficacy of these
agents is very poor, the incidence of side effects is high,
and there is no clear evidence suggesting that their administration
results in improved survival . Furthermore, therapeutic doses
of anti-cancer drugs have been reported to reduce the host anti-tumor
immune response, and the postoperative use of immunosuppressants
has been shown to accelerate the recurrence of malignancy. Thus,
the search for other potentially useful therapeutic approaches
is necessary. Recently, Takayama et al. reported some efficacy
of adoptive immunotherapy on HCC recurrence on the basis of
a randomized clinical trial. The remarkable results shown in
this trial were very interesting and encouraging, although the
procedure is relatively complicated and time-consuming, and
requires hospitalization to perform. Under these circumstances,
other options such as immunotherapy or radiation have little
practical application in a daily clinical setting, and have
been used only within research trials. The disappointing state
of medical treatment for HCC justifies the interest in the administration
of functional foods such as AHCC as a BRM, although its anti-tumor
effects remain uncertain in a clinical setting.
A major disadvantage in this study is that it is not randomized.
A randomized trial would be of higher value, since the type
of treatment allocation we have followed may prompt severe biases
that are very difficult to control. However, most of the functional
foods including AHCC, are on the market in Japan and are available
easily without a prescription because it is not a medicine that
is required to be prescribed by a physician. It is very difficult
to strictly control the patients addressed to each arm, because
the patients who prefer the functional food may obtain it out
of the trial. Therefore, it is difficult to complete a randomized
trial in regard to the functional foods. Allocation to each
arm on the basis of the patient's own selection rather than
randomization may be better for the trial of functional foods.
In the case of the functional food, the patients enrolled may
divide into each arm more exactly in the trial according to
the preferences of the patients, compared to those in the randomized
trial. Therefore, randomization was not considered in this study,
despite many issues for severe biases in non-randomized trials.
AHCC is an extract obtained from several species of mushrooms.
AHCC contains various components, but the active component is
an oligosaccharide with an average molecular weight of approximately
5000. Interestingly, in contrast to conventional active components
such as the b-1,3-glucan structural component found in PSK and
lentinan, the glucose oligomer in AHCC has an a-1,4-linkage
structure and some esterified hydroxy groups. Therefore, AHCC
may function as a BRM in the same manner as PSK and lentinan.
In vitro experiments have shown that AHCC restores the NK cell
activity that was depressed by an anti-cancer drug, and stimulated
peritoneal macrophage cytotoxicity, NO production, and cytokine
production. The combination of the anti-cancer drug and AHCC
significantly improved the prognosis of mice after the excision
of their primary tumors. Both NK cells and macrophages have
been reported to be involved in the inhibition of tumor metastasis
following activation by BRMs. Therefore, this AHCC effect may
be mediated by the natural host immunity, which is restored
or activated by AHCC. These findings suggest that AHCC may induce
its therapeutic effects on the survival of HCC patients as a
result of NK cell and macrophage activation. Accordingly, AHCC
should be considered as a potent BRM, and its anti-cancer activity
may be mediated through host immunomodulation.
Recently, AHCC was reported to protect the liver from CCl4-induced
liver injury in an animal model. The increased survival rate
of the AHCC group suggests that AHCC may have had beneficial
effects on the clinical course of patients with hepatitis or
cirrhosis, in addition to its anti-cancer effects. Indeed, AHCC
intake seemed to improve the hepatitis disease state, as suggested
by improvements in the postoperative levels of AST and GGT reported
here. In addition, the observation that the cholinesterase activity
increased in the AHCC group suggests that AHCC intake results
in some nutritional improvements in these patients. The analysis
was also performed in patients who had no recurrence. This would
eliminate the potential for a tumor related effect. Consequently,
improvements of hepatitis and nutritional status in those who
had no recurrence were also shown. These results show that the
AHCC may improve liver function independent from the tumor.
However, caution must be observed in interpreting the evaluation
of these results. These biochemical parameters may improve because
only those that survive can be examined. This eliminates those
patients with poorer baseline profiles. In addition, if the
control group has an undetected bias toward a worse outcome,
the difference might be artificial.
Our results suggest that the use of AHCC decreases both the
probability of recurrence and the hazard of death due to HCC
and/or liver cirrhosis. Furthermore, AHCC intake might also
improve hepatitis or cirrhosis in the patients who had no HCC.
The improvements in liver function in the AHCC group appear
to reflect an improved prognosis, although a randomized-controlled
trial is needed to confirm this observation if possible. The
mechanisms responsible for the anti-cancer activity and/or the
hepatitis-attenuating effect of AHCC were not explored in this
study. At present, the effects of AHCC as the result of a single
ingredient are difficult to explain, and it is similarly difficult
to reach any conclusion regarding the complex effects of AHCC
on patient survival.
AHCC intake resulted in improved liver function, the prevention
of recurrence of HCC after resection, and the prolonged survival
of postoperative HCC patients without any adverse effects. Therefore,
AHCC treatment is a valuable adjuvant therapy as a BRM in these
patients. If possible, these observations need to be confirmed
in larger, randomized-controlled double-blind trials. In addition,
more detailed studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms
responsible for the effects of AHCC.
Table 3. Significant variables in the univariate analysis
for the no recurrence ratea
Significant variables
|
ß |
SE |
HR(95% CI) |
p |
|
|
|
|
|
AHCC intake |
-0.723 |
0.252 |
0.485 |
0.0041 |
(Yes vs. no) |
|
|
(0.296-0.795) |
|
Cirrhosis |
-0.509 |
0.232 |
0.601 |
0.0278 |
(No vs. yes) |
|
|
(0.382-0.946) |
|
Child classification |
-0.596 |
0.254 |
0.551 |
0.0188 |
(A vs. B) |
|
|
(0.335-0.906) |
|
Basal albumin |
-0.503 |
0.241 |
0.605 |
0.037 |
(>38 vs. <38g/l) |
|
|
(0.377-0.970) |
|
Basal cholinesterase |
-0.534 |
0.242 |
0.586 |
0.0276 |
(>3768 vs. <3768U/l) |
|
|
(0.365-0.943) |
|
ICG R 15min |
-0.475 |
0.24 |
0.622 |
0.048 |
(<16 vs. 16%) |
|
|
(0.388-0.996) |
|
ICG K value |
-0.545 |
0.258 |
0.58 |
0.0347 |
(>0.122 vs. <0.122)
|
|
|
(0.350-0.962) |
|
Operation length |
-0.506 |
0.237 |
0.603 |
0.0326 |
(<265 vs. >265min)
|
|
|
(0.379-0.959) |
|
Number of nodules |
-0.946 |
0.233 |
0.388 |
<0.0001 |
(Single vs. two or more) |
|
|
(0.246-0.613) |
|
Blood transfusion |
-0.578 |
0.244 |
0.561 |
0.0177 |
(No vs. yes) |
|
|
(0.348-0.905) |
|
Stage |
-0.670 |
0.235 |
0.512 |
0.0044 |
(I/II vs. III/IVA)b |
|
|
(0.323-0.812) |
|
Basal a-fetoprotein |
-1.055 |
0.242 |
0.348 |
<0.0001 |
(<100 vs. 100µg/l) |
|
|
(0.217-0.560) |
|
Basal PIVKA II |
-0.586 |
0.238 |
0.556 |
0.0138 |
(<100 vs. 100AU/l) |
|
|
(0.349-0.887) |
|
a. AHCC, active hexose correlated compound;
ICG, indocyanine green; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K
absence; ß, regression coefficients; SE,
standard error; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
b. The Stage was defined according to the General Rules for
the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer
by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.
Table 4. Significant variables in the univariate analysis
for the no recurrence ratea
Significant variables
|
ß
|
SE |
HR(95% CI) |
p |
No recurrence |
|
|
|
|
AHCC intake |
-0.448 |
0.203 |
0.639 |
0.0277 |
(Yes vs. no) |
|
|
(0.429-0.952) |
|
Basal total bilirubin |
-0.443 |
0.196 |
0.642 |
0.0242 |
(<0.8 vs. >0.8mg/dl) |
|
|
(0.437-0.944) |
|
Basal cholinesterase |
-0.44 |
0.199 |
0.644 |
0.0267 |
(>3768 vs. <3768U/l) |
|
|
(0.436-0.950) |
|
Number of nodules |
-0.88 |
0.203 |
0.415 |
<0.0001 |
(Single vs. two or more) |
|
|
(0.279-0.618) |
|
Basal a-fetoprotein |
-0.561 |
0.215 |
0.571 |
0.0092 |
(<100 vs. >100µg/l)
|
|
|
(0.374-0.870) |
|
Overall survival |
|
|
|
|
AHCC intake |
-0.865 |
0.26 |
0.421 |
0.0009 |
(Yes vs. no) |
|
|
(0.253-0.701) |
|
ICG 15min |
-0.728 |
0.249 |
0.483 |
0.0035 |
(<16 vs. >16%)
|
|
|
(0.296-0.787) |
|
Number of nodules |
-0.807 |
0.258 |
0.446 |
0.0017 |
(Single vs. two or more) |
|
|
(0.269-0.739) |
|
Stage |
-0.583 |
0.266 |
0.558 |
0.0285 |
(I/II vs. III/IVA)b
|
|
|
(0.331-0.941) |
|
Basal a-fetoprotein |
-1.010 |
0.248 |
0.364 |
<0.0001 |
(<100 vs. >100µg/l)
|
|
|
(0.224-0.592) |
|
a. AHCC, active hexose correlated compound;
ICG, indocyanine green; PIVKA, protein induced by vitamin K
absence; ß, regression coefficients; SE,
standard error; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.
b. The Stage was defined according to the General Rules for
the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer
by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.
|
Ten biochemical parameters were investigated for a period
of 5 years after surgery in the two groups. Of these ten
parameters, three parameters, including the serum levels
of AST, GGT, and cholinesterase activity, were significantly
improved in the AHCC group than in the controls, as demonstrated
using a two-way analysis of variance (Fig. 2). No significant
differences were observed in the other seven parameters,
which included the serum levels of alanine transaminase
activity, alkaline phosphatase activity, total bilirubin,
albumin levels, platelet count, a-fetoprotein levels,
and PIVKA II levels (data not shown).
Fig. 2. Biochemical parameters in HCC patients after
hepatic resection. The closed circles indicate the levels
of the appropriate parameters in the AHCC group, and the
open circles indicate the levels in the controls. There
were significant differences between the two groups on
a two-way analysis of variance with ScheffŽ's F-test.
The data are expressed as medians. (A) Aspartate transaminase
activity, P=0.0011; (B) g-glutamyltransferase activity,
P<0.0001; (C) cholinesterase activity, P=0.0013.
To eliminate the potential for a tumor related effect
on these ten biochemical parameters, and to clarify whether
the AHCC improved liver function independently from the
tumor, the parameters were also investigated after excluding
the data of the patients who had recurrence. Consequently,
of the ten parameters mentioned above, the same three
parameters, including the serum levels of AST, GGT, and
cholinesterase activity, were significantly improved in
the AHCC group than
|
|
Fig. 3. Biochemical parameters in HCC patients who had
no recurrence after hepatic resection. The closed circles
indicate the levels of the appropriate parameters in the
AHCC group, and the open circles indicate the levels in
the controls. There were significant differences between
the two groups on a two-way analysis of variance with ScheffŽ's
F-test. The data are expressed as medians. (A) Aspartate
transaminase activity, P=0.0176; (B) g-glutamyltrans-ferase
activity, P=0.0007; (C) cholinesterase activity,
P=0.0266. |
Acknowledgements
We thank Kohji Wakame and Kenichi Kosuna (Amino Up Chemical
Co. Ltd) for providing the AHCC free of cost.
References
The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, Primary liver cancer
in Japan, In: S. Watanabe, S. Tominaga and T. Kakizoe, eds.,
Japanese Cancer Association. Cancer Treatment and Survival,
Gann Monograph on Cancer Research No. 43 (1995) pages 81-95
(Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo)
M. Shimada, K. Takenaka, K. Taguchi, Y. Fujiwara, T. Gion,
K. Kajiyama et al., Prognostic factors after repeat hepatectomy
for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, Ann Surg 227
(1998) 80-85
M. Shimada, T. Matsumata, A. Taketomi, K. Yamamoto, H. Itasaka,
K. Sugimachi, Repeat hepatectomy for recurrent hepatocellular
carcinoma, Surgery 115 (1994) 703-706
J.L. Raoul, D. Guyader, J.F. Bretagne, J.F. Heautot, R. Duvauferrier,
P. Bourguet et al., Prospective randomized trial of chemoembolization
versus intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled-iodized
oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, Hepatology
26 (1997) 1156-1161
P.E. Majno, R. Adam, H. Bismuth, D. Castaing, A. Ariche, J.
Krissat et al., Influence of preoperative transarterial lipiodol
chemoembolization on resection and transplantation for hepatocellular
carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis, Ann Surg 226 (1997)
688-703
L. Castellano, M. Calandra, C.V. Blanco, I. De Sio, Predictive
factors of survival and intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular
carcinoma in cirrhosis after percutaneous ethanol injection:
analysis of 71 patients, J Hepatol 27 (1997) 862-870
M. Ebara, M. Ohto, N. Sugiura, K. Kita, M. Yoshikawa, K. Okuda
et al., Percutaneous ethanol injection for the treatment of
small hepatocellular carcinoma. Study of 95 patients, J Gastroenterol
Hepatol 5 (1990) 616-626
T. Seki, M. Wakabayashi, T. Nakagawa, T. Itho, T. Shiro, K.
Kunieda et al., Ultrasonically guided percutaneous microwave
coagulation therapy for small hepatocellular carcinoma, Cancer
74 (1994) 817-825
R. Murakami, S. Yoshimatu, Y. Yamashita, T. Matsukawa, M. Takahashi,
K. Sagara, Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of percutaneous
microwave coagulation, AJR 164 (1995) 1159-1164
E. Kouroumalis, P. Skordilis, K. Thermos, A. Vasilaki, J. Moschandrea,
O.N. Manousos, Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with octreotide:
a randomised controlled study, Gut 42 (1998) 442-447
Cancer of the Liver Italian Programme Group, Tamoxifen in treatment
of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial,
Lancet 352 (1998) 17-20
S. Pignata, B. Daniele, C. Gallo, R. De Vivo, S. Monfardini,
F. Perrone, Endocrine treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Any evidence of benefit?, Eur J Cancer 34 (1998) 25-32
Y. Mizushima, N. Yuhki, M. Hosokawa, H. Kobayashi, Diminution
of cyclophosphamide-induced suppression of antitumor immunity
by an immunomodulator PS-K and combined therapeutic effects
of PS-K and cyclophosphamide on transplanted tumor in rats,
Cancer Res 42 (1982) 5176-5180
Y. Nishioka, M. Hirao, P.D. Robbins, M.T. Lotze, H. Tahara,
Induction of systemic and therapeutic antitumor immunity using
intratumoral injection of dendritic cells genetically modified
to express interleukin 12, Cancer Res 59 (1999) 4035-4041
J. Akiyama, T. Kawamura, E. Gotohda, Y. Yamada, M. Hosokawa,
T. Kodama et al., Immunochemotherapy of transplanted KMT-17
tumor in WKA rats by combination of cyclophosphamide and immunostimulatory
protein-bound polysaccharide isolated from basidiomycetes, Cancer
Res 37 (1977) 3042-3045
H. Nakazato, A. Koike, S. Saji, N. Ogawa, J. Sakamoto, Efficacy
of immunochemotherapy as adjuvant treatment after curative resection
of gastric cancer, Lancet 343 (1994) 1122-1126
T. Takayama, T. Sekine, M. Makuuchi, S. Yamasaki, T. Kosuge,
J. Yamamoto et al., Adoptive immunotherapy to lower postsurgical
recurrence rates of hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised trial,
Lancet 356 (2000) 802-807
J.A. Milner, Functional foods: the US perspective, Am J Clin
Nutr 71 (Suppl) (2000) 1654S-1659S
M.B. Roberfroid, Concepts and strategy of functional food science:
the European perspective, Am J Clin Nutr 71 (Suppl) (2000)
1660S-1664S
P.J. Agett, J. Alexander, M. Alles, P.A. Anderson, J.M. Antonie,
M. Ashwell et al., Scientific concepts of functional foods in
Europe consensus document, Br J Nutr 81 (1999) S1-S27
K. Matsushita, Y. Kuramitsu, Y. Ohiro, M. Obara, M. Kobayashi,
Y.Q. Li et al., Combination therapy of active hexose correlated
compound plus UFT significantly reduces the metastasis of rat
mammary adenocarcinoma, Anticancer Drugs 9 (1998) 343-350
M. Ghoneum, Y. Ninomiya, M. Torabi, G. Gill, A. Wojdani, Active
hemicellulose compound (AHCC) enhance NK cell activity of aged
mice in vivo, FASEB J 6 (1992) A1213
K. Imai, S. Matsuyama, S. Miyake, K. Suga, K. Nakachi, Natural
cytotoxic activity of peripheral-blood lymphocytes and cancer
incidence: an 11-year follow-up study of a general population,
Lancet 356 (2000) 1795-1799
B. Sun, K. Wakame, T. Mukoda, A. Toyoshima, T. Kanazawa, K.
Kosuna, Protective effects of AHCC on carbon tetrachloride induced
liver injury in mice, Nat Med 51 (1997) 310-315
K. Wakame, Protective effects of active hexose correlated compound
(AHCC) on the onset of diabetes induced by storeptozotocin in
the rat, Biomed Res 20 (1999) 145-152
F. Ichida, T. Tsuji, M. Omata, T. Ichida, K. Inoue, T. Kamimura
et al., New Inuyama Classification: new criteria for histological
assessment of chronic hepatitis, Int Hepatol Commun 6
(1996) 112-119
The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, The General Rules for
the Clinical and Pathological Study of Primary Liver Cancer,
4th ed. edition, (Kanehara, Tokyo, 2000)
R.G. Simonetti, A. Liberati, C. Angiolini, L. Pagliaro, Review.
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review of
randomized controlled trials, Ann Oncol 8 (1997) 117-136
G. Torzilli, M. Makuuchi, K. Inoue, T. Takayama, Y. Sakamoto,
Y. Sugawara et al., No-mortality liver resection for hepatocellular
carcinoma in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients, Arch Surg
134 (1999) 984-992
R.T.-P. Poon, S.-T. Fan, C.-M. Lo, I.O.-L. Ng, C.-L. Liu, C.-M.
Lam et al., Improving survival results after resection of hepatocellular
carcinoma: a prospective study of 377 patients over 10 years,
Ann Surg 234 (2001) 63-70
K. Shirabe, T. Kanematsu, T. Matsumata, E. Adachi, K. Akazawa,
K. Sugimachi, Factors linked to early recurrence of small hepatocellular
carcinoma after hepatectomy: univariate and multivariate analyses,
Hepatology 14 (1991) 802-805
J. Belghiti, Y. Panis, O. Farges, J.P. Benhamou, F. Fekete,
Intrahepatic recurrence after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
complicating cirrhosis, Ann Surg 214 (1991) 114-117
E. Mihich, Immnosuppression in cancer therapeutics, Transplant
Proc 7 (1975) 275-278
© Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science, All rights
reserved.